How We Test Live Casinos
The exact method behind our live casino rankings: the five criteria we score, how we weight them, and why we never rank on bonuses. 19+.
By Iris Tran · Live-casino editor · Updated June 24, 2026
Our rankings are only as good as the method behind them, so here it is in full. Every live casino we list is scored on five criteria, weighted toward the things that actually affect your safety and experience — not marketing.
The five criteria
- Licensing and regulation (weighted heaviest). For Ontario, an operator must be licensed in Ontario and supervised by the AGCO to appear at all. This is a gate, not just a score: unregistered sites are excluded entirely.
- Live game range and quality. How many live blackjack, roulette, baccarat, game-show and poker tables run, the studios behind them, and whether there are Canadian-facing or branded rooms.
- Software providers. Which studios power the tables — Evolution, Pragmatic Play Live, Playtech, Ezugi — since this drives stream quality and variety. See our providers guide.
- Payments and payout speed. Support for Canadian methods like Interac, sensible limits, and how quickly verified withdrawals actually arrive.
- Responsible-gambling tools. Deposit and time limits, self-exclusion, reality checks, and clear links to help. We weight this heavily.
How we score
Each criterion is scored and combined into the rating out of five shown in our tables. Licensing and responsible-gambling tools carry the most weight because they protect you; flashy extras carry the least. Where two operators are close, the tie-breaker is the live experience itself — stream stability, table variety and how cleanly the mobile version runs.
What we deliberately ignore
We do not score or display welcome bonuses, free spins or any other inducement. That’s partly compliance — Ontario prohibits advertising these to the public — and partly principle: ranking casinos on bonuses rewards the loudest marketing, not the best product. We’d rather tell you which operator pays out fastest and runs the most stable tables.
Testing the tables in practice
Scoring criteria only mean something if someone actually sits at the tables, so we do. For each operator we open the live lobby and check what is genuinely running rather than what the marketing claims — how many blackjack, roulette and baccarat tables are live at different times of day, whether the stream holds a stable quality on a normal home connection, and how long the dealer gives you to place a bet. We note the bet ranges too, because a casino that only offers high-minimum tables is a poor fit for a casual player however polished its studio looks. Where an operator runs Canadian-facing or branded rooms, we say so, since those are often the difference between a generic lobby and one built with local players in mind.
We also put the practical side through its paces: registering an account, confirming the geo-location and age checks behave as the AGCO requires, and walking through a deposit and a small withdrawal so we can describe payout speed from experience rather than from a help page. The responsible-gambling tools get the same treatment — we open the deposit-limit, time-out and self-exclusion controls to confirm they are real, easy to find and effective, not buried three menus deep.
Where our figures come from
The numbers on this site are deliberately sourced, not invented. The list of who is allowed to operate in Ontario comes from the AGCO’s public register of internet gaming operators, which we re-check rather than trust a brand’s own claim. House-edge and return-to-player figures are the standard published values for optimal or typical play, and we flag when a figure assumes basic strategy or a specific bet. If we cannot verify something, we leave it out — an honest gap is better than a confident guess.
How we stay independent
We are transparent about how the site is funded: we may earn a commission when a reader visits an operator through one of our links. That arrangement has no influence on the order of our rankings or the scores behind them, and no operator can pay to move up the table. Licensing is a hard gate — an unregistered site is excluded no matter what it might offer — and the rest of the position is earned on the criteria above. Keeping the commercial relationship and the editorial judgement separate is the only way a comparison like this is worth reading.
Keeping it current
The AGCO register changes, operators add and retire tables, and payment options shift. We re-check these regularly and update pages accordingly, with a “last updated” date on every review so you can see how fresh the assessment is.